Evaluation criteria according to 10 point system. Ten-point system: mark values

1 point
The unreachable edge of horror. Universal evil. If you dream in a nightmare, you will have to visit a psychiatrist. Perhaps more than once.

2 points
90-60-90
height-weight-age
Thick and scary stuff. It is given to the first comer for a bottle of cheap beer, or it will break down to the last breath. As a "female" is not considered.

3 points
A gray, ugly, plump girl who was very unlucky in life with her appearance. There are rumors that they have sex.
Usually such girls either give with very great strain (due to their terrible complexes), or give to all the few comrades who need it from them.

4 points
An ordinary gray girl, not popular with men. In this case, it can be either with a normal figure, but ugly in the face, or simply too full. At in large numbers alcohol will do, but again, not everyone. Seducing such a problem is not, but think about whether you need it.

5 points
Neither fish nor fowl. There are millions of them. 7 out of 10 passing girls will fall into this category. It’s not a shame to seduce such a woman, but there’s nothing to boast about either.
Standard. Such girls are the easiest to make “contact”.

6 points
Either a very well-groomed 5-ka, or just a pretty girl who can be seduced and this will be a good memory. Usually such girls are suitable for long-term relationships because of their complaisance.
Seducing this is not a big problem, but you have to work a little.

7 points
From nature beautiful girl. With a good figure and a pretty face. It is popular among men and therefore there is a protective barrier against obviously unacceptable or unsuccessful men. This is the most "controversial" category among pick-up artists. Here, opinions fluctuate both up and down. In general, the seduction of the 7-ki remains in the memory of very good memories.

8 points
Fashion model. Naturally gifted with good looks and a cool figure. For the most part, such girls are well off and have the opportunity to take care of their appearance. The percentage of such girls is very small among all, but having seduced her, you can be proud of it and know that you are "one of the very best." In most cases, it will take more than one date to seduce such a girl.

9 points
This is your ideal. And for everyone it is not less than 8 points, but it sunk into your soul. This is exactly what you dream of. A very beautiful girl (7-8 points) with whom you have a long-term relationship and she is “the one” for you can also fall into this category.
The seduction of such a girl is definitely beyond the standard, so here you will have to make every effort.

10 points
The unattainable edge of beauty and inner qualities of a girl. If you met her, then consider that you are one in a million. There is no need to seduce, you will immediately understand everything with her.

I studied the official documents and is ready to explain what each mark is for.

First level (low): 1-2 points

Recognizing, recognizing and distinguishing concepts are requirements for the lowest marks.Yes, yes, no zero knowledge.

Second level (satisfactory): 3-4 points

Marks 3 and 4 are given to students who present educational material from memory, that is, a memorized theory is enough for satisfactory scores.

Third level (intermediate): 5-6 points

To get 5 or 6 points, the educational material must not only be reproduced, but understood. Plus, be able to describe and analyze actions with objects of study.

Fourth level (sufficient): 7-8 points

A student who claims to be of a sufficient level easily applies knowledge in practice and gives his own examples, similar to those given in the textbook. On the basis of a generalized algorithm, he also solves new learning objectives. Another requirement is the ability to understand the essence of the objects being studied and perform actions with clearly defined rules.

Fifth level (high): 9-10 points

Applicants for "9" and "10" apply knowledge in unfamiliar, non-standard situations. And to solve qualitatively new problems. They independently describe, explain and transform the objects of study.

If the material was useful to you, do not forget to put "I like" in our social networks

0

5-point system vs. 10-point system: which is better?

The knowledge assessment system is an integral element educational process. In fact, this is the basic criterion for determining the level of assimilation of educational material. Most Russian parents are accustomed to and understand the 5-point system, because we remember it from our childhood. Abroad, new systems are relevant - 10-, 12- and even 100-point. This trend has not bypassed domestic education either: some schools, in addition to the usual 5-point scale, have introduced an assessment system on a scale of 10 points.

Which system is better? What to look for when choosing between the old and the new format of knowledge assessment? And how do children react to evaluation of their progress in general? Let's talk about it below.

Evaluation as a factor influencing the formation of personality

FROM early childhood we are going through a process of socialization, that is, integration into the existing society. The role of connecting links between the individual and society is performed by the so-called agents of socialization: first it is their own family, and then a kindergarten, school, university, work team. But if the family, as a rule, loves us for who we are, then the location of other agents still needs to be earned. Moreover, these agents are constantly evaluating us.

AT kindergarten the educator evaluates the behavior and success of the child: how he spends time, how he contacts other children and staff, how easy it is for him to play collective games, tasks and exercises. This is how children get used to evaluation - they begin to understand that their behavior is constantly compared with some reference values ​​("rather smart", "not too obedient", "very sociable"). Then they are evaluated at school, but here the emphasis is already on the level of assimilation of knowledge from curriculum- the student receives low or high marks. This experience is extrapolated to all further social life. At the university, a former student becomes an excellent student, a loser or an average student, and at work, respectively, a good, bad or mediocre employee.

The pubertal period of development falls precisely on the school years, so the assessment system at school has a special influence on the development of the child. Today the situation in schools is ambiguous: some educational establishments use the traditional 5-point system for Russia, others are gradually moving to a 10-point system, and some even use them in parallel. For example, in elementary grades, students are given grades from 1 to 5, and in middle and senior grades, from 1 to 10.

5-point system: pros and cons

As planned, the scale from 1 to 5 shows how the student has mastered the educational material. At the same time, each quantitative assessment corresponds to a certain semantic characteristic.

Grade

Student characteristics

Does not know or understand the material at all

Doesn't know much of the material. Answers oral questions uncertainly, makes gross mistakes in written works

Knows the basic material, but cannot use the acquired knowledge correctly in practice without outside help. Makes mistakes in oral and written responses

Knows the required material, answers questions without difficulty, applies the acquired knowledge in practice. Does not make blunders in verbal responses, but only minor errors in writing

Knows program material in in full, demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic, answers the teacher's questions correctly and confidently, is able to independently solve practical problems with the help of acquired knowledge. Does not make mistakes in oral and written answers

Pros:

  • the system is traditional and familiar, and therefore understandable to both students and parents;
  • good grades (in particular, fives) significantly increase the student's self-esteem.

Minuses:

  • assessment criteria do not make it possible to accurately and objectively assess the knowledge of the student (hence the widespread use of non-existent in principle grades like “4+”, “3-”, etc.);
  • the system does not objectively determine the student's educational progress (even if the student has allowed less mistakes than last time, or answered correctly, but made a mistake on the letter, his score will not change);
  • bad marks negatively affect the student's self-esteem and can cause serious psychological trauma;
  • very often the assessment is determined not by the academic success and real achievements of the child, but by the behavior and subjective attitude of the teacher.

10-point system: pros and cons

The main difference of this system is a deeper classification and detailing of the student's educational achievements. In addition to the level of assimilation of the material, such a scale also shows quality characteristics learning activities.

Grade

Characteristic

Level of learning activity

Complete lack of learning activity

unsatisfactory

Discrimination, recognition, superficial acquaintance with the subject

Almost Satisfactory

Satisfactorily

Memorization and unconscious reproduction

Very satisfactory

Understanding the theory, awareness

Quite good

Very well

Full knowledge of theoretical material

Almost perfect

Non-standard creative approach to the application of acquired knowledge

Perfect

The system was called a 10-point system, although in fact it contains 11 marks - from 0 to 10. The mark "0" is provided for those cases when the student simply refuses to answer a question or complete a task. But at the same time, the assessment cannot characterize the level of assimilation of the material, which is why it was not displayed in the name of the scale.

Pros:

  • extended gradation allows you to more clearly and objectively determine the current level of knowledge;
  • the scale allows you to analyze the mental abilities of the student, assess the involvement in studying proccess and discover it weak spots;
  • the system is psychologically comfortable - scores from 5 points are already positive;
  • the gap between excellent students and poor students, which is uncomfortable for students, is reduced: all students who receive from 7 to 10 points are successful by definition.

Minuses:

  • the system does not solve the traditional problems of school education: the psychological trauma of poor students, the subjective attitude of teachers, etc.;
  • parents get confused in new scores and do not always understand what this or that score indicates.

Both systems cannot be called ideal, but it is obvious that the 10-point scale is still more comfortable for students and makes the process of assessing knowledge at least a little, but more adequate. Therefore, if there is a choice, it is better to send the child to a school where grades are given from 1 to 10. It is optimal if the child gets used to such a system already from the first grade and studies according to it until graduation. A sharp transition from one scale to another, which is sometimes practiced in domestic schools, brings children only additional discomfort.


An interesting fact: the Finnish school system, which is considered the best in the whole world, has abandoned grades altogether. According to employees of the Finnish Ministry of Education, children study in order to receive and use knowledge, and not for the sake of good grades. The innovative approach has already proved its effectiveness: Finnish graduates are breaking all records of success, and their parents are calm about the psychological health of their children.

Already this year, the country will begin an experiment on a new, more fractional assessment of student performance - a 10-point scale.

This was recently announced by Minister of Education and Science Andrei Fursenko. But, as it turned out, there are already schools in Moscow that did this back in the last century. In one of them - gymnasium N 1587 in Maryino - the correspondent of "RG" went.

Seven in Geometry

Gymnasium N1587 in Maryino has been working according to the new method for ten years. I switched to a 10-point system when there was no USE at all. Unusual experiment started here ten years ago. The principal of the school accidentally got to a seminar at the regional pedagogical university and, having learned about the new methodology for assessing knowledge, decided to try it at home. The district authorities did not object, the parents also spoke in favor, but some teachers had to be persuaded. Especially for a long time teachers of senior classes resisted - they were afraid that they could spoil the certificates of medalists. What if you have to correct weak fives for solid fours? If a student does not receive the highest possible score for a year, how can he be given a medal? In the end, they were also convinced.

We developed a rating scale for each subject and type of tasks. For example, 10 points in the Russian language will be given to someone who not only demonstrates excellent knowledge, but also reaches the research level in creative work, "reads artistically, writes without a single mistake, cleanly and accurately."

Let's take physics. Ten will be put only if the student's knowledge goes beyond the school curriculum. This is an assessment of knowledge of the Olympiad level. It's not easy to deserve it. But no one here sheds tears about this. All the same, five goes to the certificate, and it doesn’t matter how many points you have - 8, 9 or 10.

According to the director of the gymnasium, Nadezhda Timashkova, everything except reverse translation points in the certificate, they are satisfied with:

"The teacher has more opportunities to objectively assess knowledge, parents like that children are not given twos and ones, students have more incentives to study well - more noticeable achievements. Today you got four points, tomorrow - five, the day after tomorrow - six "...

Proud Four

Russian language teacher Galina Anatolyevna Biryukova - candidate pedagogical sciences. She defended her dissertation according to the new ten-point system and assures that she does not skimp on high marks for her students: “I gave 10 points in the last lesson, but I often give nine. where students are graded on a 12-point system. It's a more objective grading scale."

Opponents of the five-point system make an argument: fives, fours, threes are very different. "There are three with a minus and a four with two pluses," Vadim Muranov, one of the winners of the "Teacher of the Year" contest, noted in an interview with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. "There are only three positive marks in the school, and the exam is set on a 100-point scale."

Indeed, at existing system, for example, for excellent knowledge, a gifted student - the winner of the Olympiad, and one who just learned a lesson will get a five. And in the gymnasium, the choice of three marks is 8, 9, 10. The Olympian will be given a ten, and the diligent student - 8.

It is also true that the 10-point system generally corresponds to the USE scale. Therefore, the transition to the exam in this gymnasium was easier than in other schools. Both students and teachers understood the principle of evaluation: for each skill, ability, correct answer - a point. The USE scale turned out to be very understandable and transparent: I got 80 points - it's the same as in the gymnasium 8. So, the result is excellent. Received 50 - this is 5 points, that is, a three. And it never occurred to a single student from this gymnasium to prove that, having scored 50 points, he successfully passed the exam.

But there is a danger that unclaimed marks will remain in the ten-point system - for example, dozens. Indeed, even in the gymnasium, where children enter by competition, ten points are rarely given. What can we say about an ordinary school!?

Another nuance - a gold medal is given for outstanding academic achievement. If earlier - for five, then with new system, apparently, for tens. Medalists will obviously decrease. Perhaps, when entering universities, the difficult question will arise of converting the grades of those who have already received a five-point certificate into a ten-point system.

Shall we go to chemistry class? - I offer finally to the director of the gymnasium.

The class is explaining a new topic. In a whisper, I ask a schoolgirl at the first desk: "What was the last grade you got in chemistry?" "Four". Translated into the usual system - a weak three, a three with a minus. But how does it sound - "four"!

And how are they

All schools in Belarus switched to a ten-point system from September 1, 2002. Schools in Moldova use a scale of 10 points, Ukraine - 12 points, France - 20 points.

Help "RG"

What and why (mathematics)

1 score (very weak) the student copied from the board, wrote down under the dictation of the teacher, tried to delve into the material

2 points (weakly) can repeat some of the basic definitions, is not able to independently perform a single practical task with this theory

3 points (mediocre) memorized most of the material, but cannot explain, gets confused in the answers

4 points (satisfactory) remembered everything, performs practical tasks with the help of a teacher

5 points (not good enough) can explain some questions of the theory, solves only those problems where the algorithm is known

6 points (good) answers most questions, shows awareness of theoretical knowledge, rarely makes computational errors

7 points (very good) clearly and logically presents the theoretical material, applies the theory in practice, rarely makes computational errors

8 points (excellent) complete understanding of the essence of the theory, application in practice, manages to complete practical tasks in the allotted time. Can correct his own mistake

9 points (excellent) easily performs practical tasks, solves non-standard tasks

10 points (excellent) non-standard applies the acquired knowledge in practice, can independently acquire additional knowledge, working with literature and a computer.

Lyudmila Timchishina, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Director of Gymnasium No. 11, Korolev, Moscow Region:

The fact that the range of grades becomes wider is better for the school. After all, you can’t put a student with five with a minus or four with two pluses in a magazine or a certificate. Take, for example, excellent students. A gold medal, of course, it is a gold one, only the sample is different. Fives are also different. At one - strained, at another - honest. Five with a minus turns into a five, four with a minus turns into a four. But there is a difference between these estimates, you see.

Against

Sergei Mendelevich, Honored Teacher of Russia, director of school N 57, Moscow:

The main disadvantage of the ten-point system is the complexity of assessment for the teacher. If now he has a choice of three boundaries - 5/4, 4/3, 3/2, then with a ten-point system, the boundaries will stretch and clear uniform criteria will be needed for each subject and type of assignment, as well as for the lowest grades, for example, for a deuce . We will have to look for answers to the questions: where is the boundary between a satisfactory and unsatisfactory grade, who can be transferred to the next class, and who cannot ...

According to Muzaev, this issue has long been discussed in Russia, but a lot of work needs to be done to abolish the five-point grading system.

According to the deputy head of Rosobrnadzor, in order to switch to another assessment system, it is necessary to improve the qualifications of teachers. On the this moment teachers do not know modern methods of assessing students' knowledge.

While there are many around the world various systems evaluation. Vechernyaya Moskva decided to tell about some of them.

five point system

This system is traditional not only for Russian schools. It, for example, is used in Germany, only upside down - 1 for German schoolchildren means excellent, and 5 means unsatisfactory. The same system is used in the Czech Republic, Austria and Slovakia.

But the usual five points for us can be obtained in schools in Estonia, Serbia, Hungary, Croatia, Macedonia, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia.

ten point system

This grading system is quite common all over the world. In this system, 10 is an excellent result, and 1 is complete ignorance of the school course. Adopted in the Baltic countries, in Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, as well as in Romania and Albania.

In 2002, Belarus switched to the ten-point system. Their system has five levels - low (from 1 to 2), satisfactory (from 3 to 4), average (from 5 to 6), sufficient (from 7 to 8) and high (from 9 to 10).

At the same time, Belarusian schoolchildren and graduates will not have problems if they decide to continue their education in Russia. Especially for this, the Ministry of Education and Science Russian Federation in 2003 published a letter that establishes the ratio of assessments of educational organizations in Russia and Belarus. So, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the Belarusian system is 3 in the Russian system, 6, 7 and 8 corresponds to the "four", and 9 and 10 correspond to the Russian assessment of "excellent".

100 point system

Alphabetical system

The cradle of such a system, which is also called the Anglo-Saxon, is the United States. Here, students are graded on a five-point scale from A to F, where A is an analogue of our “five”, and F is “two”. As in Russia, pluses and minuses are also used, but they do not have real weight in assessing a student's knowledge.

With minor changes, this system has been adopted by many countries, including Canada, Sweden, Norway, Japan, Hong Kong, Indonesia, South Korea as well as Malaysia and Thailand.

Exception to the rule

Ukraine has a 12-point system, which can be divided into levels. The first level (1-3 points) is the lowest, the second level is average (4-6 points), the third level is sufficient (7-9 points) and high (10-12 points). At the same time, a score of 12 points is given only for very outstanding student success.

In France, Belgium, Venezuela, Lebanon, Tunisia, Peru and high school in Portugal, a 20-point system is used, in which it is almost impossible to get excellent (18.5-20 points) and most students remain good students.

There is a country in the world that has managed to distinguish itself from the rest. In Denmark, as a result of the education reform in 2007, the 13-point system turned into a 7-point system. Everything would be fine, but these are scores 12, 10, 7, 4, 02, 00 and -3.

By the way, in the All-Russian Library of Foreign Literature named after Margarita Rudomino, for everyone, on August 7, they will hold