Interconnected control systems. Systems of connected regulation. Autonomous ACPs. Decoupled control Decoupled control systems

2. Classification of ASR. Management principles.

Control- this is a purposeful impact on the object, which ensures its optimal (in a certain sense) functioning and is quantified by the value of the quality criterion (indicator). The criteria may be of a technological or economic nature (performance of a process unit, production cost, etc.).

During operation, the output values ​​deviate from the set values ​​due to disturbances z B and there is a mismatch between the current at T and given and 3 object output values. If available disturbances z B the object independently ensures normal functioning, i.e. independently eliminates the resulting mismatch at T-and 3, then it does not need to be controlled. If the object does not ensure the fulfillment of the conditions for normal operation, then to neutralize the influence of disturbances, it is imposed control action x R, changing the material or heat flows of the object with the help of the actuator. Thus, in the process of control, the object is subjected to influences that compensate for disturbances and ensure the maintenance of its normal operation.

regulationcalled maintaining the output values ​​of the object near the required constant or variable values ​​in order to ensure the normal mode of its operation by applying control actions to the object.

An automatic device that maintains the output values ​​of an object near the required values ​​is called automatic regulator.

According to the principle of regulation ASR is divided into those operating by deviation, by disturbance and by the combined principle.

By deviation. In systems operating on the deviation of the controlled value from the set value (Fig. 1-2, a), outrage z causes a deviation of the actual value of the controlled variable at from its given value and. The automatic controller AP compares the values u and i, in case of their mismatch, it produces a regulatory effect X of the corresponding sign, which is fed through the actuator (not shown in the figure) to the regulated object of the OR, and eliminates this mismatch. In deviation control systems, mismatch is necessary for the formation of regulatory actions, this is their disadvantage, since the task of the regulator is precisely to prevent mismatch. However, in practice, such systems have received predominant distribution, since the regulatory action in them is carried out regardless of the number, type and place of occurrence of disturbing influences. Deviation control systems are closed.

Out of indignation. When regulating by disturbance (Fig. 1-2, b) AP B regulator receives information about the current value of the main disturbing action z1. When measuring it and not matching with nominal value and B the regulator generates a regulatory action X, directed to the object. In perturbed systems, the control signal passes through the loop faster than in systems based on the principle of deviation, as a result of which the perturbing effect can be eliminated even before the mismatch occurs. However, it is practically impossible to implement disturbance control for most objects of chemical technology, since this requires taking into account the influence of all object disturbances ( z1, z2, ...) whose number is usually large; moreover, some of them cannot be quantified. For example, the measurement of such perturbations as a change in catalyst activity, the hydrodynamic situation in the apparatus, the conditions of heat transfer through the heat exchanger wall, and many others encounters fundamental difficulties and is often unfeasible. Usually, the main perturbation is taken into account, for example, by the load of the object.

In addition, signals about the current value of the controlled variable are sent to the control loop of the system by disturbance. at are not received, therefore, over time, the deviation of the controlled value from the nominal value may exceed the permissible limits. Disturbance control systems are open.

According to the combined principle. With such regulation, i.e., with the joint use of the principles of regulation by deviation, and by disturbance (Fig. 1-6, in), it is possible to obtain high-quality systems . In them, the influence of the main perturbation z1 is neutralized by the AR B regulator, which operates on the perturbation principle, and the influence of other perturbations (for example, z2 etc.)-regulator AR, reacting to the deviation of the current value of the reacted quantity from the set value.

According to the number of adjustable values ASR is divided into one-dimensional and multidimensional. One-dimensional systems have one adjustable value, the second - several adjustable values.

In its turn multidimensional systems can be divided into systems of uncoupled and coupled regulation. In the first of them, the regulators are not directly related to each other and affect the object of regulation common to them separately. Systems unrelated controls are usually used when the mutual influence of the controlled values ​​of the object is small or practically absent. Otherwise, systems are used associated regulation, in which regulators of different quantities of one technological object are interconnected by external links (outside the object) in order to weaken the mutual influence of controlled quantities. If at the same time it is possible to completely eliminate the influence of the controlled variables on one another, then such a system of coupled control is called autonomous.

By the number of signal paths ASR is divided into single-circuit and multi-circuit. Single-loop are called systems containing one closed loop, and multiloop- having several closed circuits

By appointment(the nature of the change in the driving influence) ASR are divided into automatic stabilization systems, program control systems and servo systems.

Automatic stabilization systems designed to maintain the controlled value at a given value, which is set constant ( u= const). These are the most common systems.

Program control systems constructed in such a way that the set value of the controlled variable is a function of time known in advance u=f(t). They are equipped with software sensors that form the value and in time. Such systems are used in the automation of chemical-technological processes of periodic action or processes operating according to a certain cycle.

In tracking systems the set value of the controlled variable is not known in advance and is a function of an external independent process variable u=f(y 1). These systems serve to control one technological quantity ( slave), which is in a certain dependence on the values ​​of another ( leading) technological value. A variety of tracking systems are systems for regulating the ratio of two quantities, for example, the consumption of two products. Such systems reproduce at the output a change in the driven value in a certain ratio with a change in the leading one. These systems seek to eliminate the mismatch between the value of the leading quantity, multiplied by a constant factor, and the value of the driven quantity.

By the nature of regulatory influences Distinguish between continuous ACP, relay and pulse.

Continuous ACPconstructed in such a way that a continuous change in the input value of the system corresponds to a continuous change in the value at the output of each link.

Relay (position) ACP have a relay link that converts a continuous input value into a discrete relay value that takes only two fixed values: the minimum and maximum possible. Relay links allow you to create systems with very high gains. However, in a closed control loop, the presence of relay links leads to self-oscillations of the controlled value with a certain period and amplitude. Systems with position controllers are relay systems.

Pulse ACPhave in their composition a pulse link that converts a continuous input value into a discrete pulse, i.e. into a sequence of pulses with a certain period of their alternation. The period of appearance of pulses is set forcibly. The input value is proportional to the amplitude or duration of the output pulses. The introduction of a pulse link frees the measuring device of the system from the load and allows the use of a low-power, but more sensitive measuring device at the output, which responds to small deviations of the controlled value, which leads to an increase in the quality of the system.

In the pulse mode, it is possible to build multi-channel circuits, while reducing the energy consumption for actuating the actuator.

Systems with a digital computing device in a closed control loop also operate in a pulsed mode, since the digital device outputs the result of the calculation in the form of pulses following at certain time intervals necessary for the calculation. This device is used when the deviation of the controlled variable from the set value must be calculated from the readings of several measuring instruments or when, in accordance with the criteria for the best performance of the system, it is necessary to calculate the program for changing the controlled variable.


Connecting the units according to the uncoupled control scheme ensures the independence of the operation of both units, i.e., changing the water flow for hot water supply over a wide range from zero (at night) to the maximum, has practically no effect on the operation of the heating system.

To do this, the water flow in the supply line must be equal to the total water flow for heating - ventilation and hot water supply. Moreover, the water consumption for hot water supply should be taken according to the maximum load of hot water supply and the minimum temperature of the water in the supply line, i.e. in the mode when the load of the hot water supply is completely covered from the supply line (if the consumer does not have storage tanks installed).

Water consumption for heating, ventilation, hot water supply and total water consumption by each network subscriber does not depend on the network configuration. The calculated flow rate by the subscriber is set using a throttle diaphragm, the hole diameter of which is determined by the formula (clause 4.17 of SP 41-101-95)

where G is the estimated water flow in the pipeline, equal to Gtotal t / h

DN - pressure quenched by the diaphragm, m

Minimum diaphragm opening size - 3 mm

Make-up system automation

Automated make-up devices maintain a constant or law-changing water pressure at the network's make-up point.

For heating networks with relatively small pressure losses in the mains and a favorable terrain profile, the pressure at the make-up point in all modes (including the mode when the network pumps are stopped) is maintained constant. It is planned to maintain a constant pressure in the return manifold in front of the network pumps with the help of an after pressure regulator (feed regulator) installed on the make-up water pipeline.

In the case when the static pressure of the heating network exceeds the pressure in the return manifold of the boiler house during operation of the network pumps, the adjustment to the static pressure is carried out manually. Water pressure is measured in the pressure pipes of the make-up pumps by local indicating and signaling pressure gauges, which give an impulse to turn on the backup pump, and in the return manifold by indicating, self-recording and signaling pressure gauges on the local shield. On the local board, it is also planned to install a secondary device indicating, recording and signaling a flow meter for measuring the consumption of make-up water and a secondary device recording and signaling an oxygen meter for measuring the oxygen content in make-up water. The resistance thermometer on the make-up line is connected to a common recorder, which simultaneously records the temperature of the network water.

In open heating networks, when installing central storage tanks, the pressure in the return pipeline is automatically regulated by two control valves, of which the first is installed on the bypass pipeline of excess network water to the storage tanks, and the second on the pipeline from the storage tanks after transfer pumps. During hours when the load of hot water supply is below the average daily, the transfer pumps are turned off, and the pressure in the return pipeline is regulated by the first valve. During hours when the hot water supply load is higher than the average daily load, the transfer pumps are automatically turned on, the first control valve is closed, and the pressure regulator switches to the control valve installed after the transfer pumps.

To ensure a constant flow of make-up water in an open heating network, a flow regulator is installed on the pressure pipeline of the make-up pumps.

The water level in the make-up deaerator tank is maintained by a control valve on the chemically treated water line. If an atmospheric deaerator is used instead of a sliding pressure vacuum deaerator, then a regulator is additionally installed to maintain a constant pressure in the deaerator column. The scheme provides for an emergency stop of the working ones: make-up and transfer pumps and automatic switching on of the backup ones, as well as signaling the pressure in the return pipeline of the level in the make-up deaerator tank and storage water tanks and the oxygen content in make-up water.

Regulation is an artificial change in the parameters and flow rate of the coolant in accordance with the actual needs of subscribers. Regulation improves the quality of heat supply, reduces excessive consumption of fuel and heat.

Depending on the point of implementation, there are:

1. central regulation - carried out at the heat source (CHP, boiler house);

2. group - at the central heating station or PDC,

3. local - at the ITP,

4. individual - directly on heat-consuming devices.

When the load is uniform, you can limit yourself to one central regulation. Central regulation is carried out according to the typical heat load, typical for the majority of subscribers in the area. Such a load can be either one type of load, for example, heating, or two different types with a certain quantitative ratio, for example, heating and hot water supply with a given ratio of the calculated values ​​of these loads.

A distinction is made between the connection of heating systems and hot water installations according to the principle of coupled and uncoupled control.

With uncoupled regulation, the operating mode of the heating system does not depend on the selection of water for hot water supply, which is achieved by installing the regulator in front of the heating system. In this case, the total water consumption for the subscriber unit is equal to the sum of the water consumption for heating and hot water supply. The overestimated water consumption in the supply line of the heating network leads to an increase in capital and operating costs to the heating networks, an increase in capital and operating costs to the heating networks, and an increase in the consumption of electricity for the transport of the coolant.

Coupled regulation allows to reduce the total water consumption in heating networks, which is achieved by installing a flow regulator at the inlet of the subscriber unit and maintaining the network water flow at the inlet constant. In this case, with an increase in water withdrawal for hot water supply, the consumption of network water for the heating system will decrease. The underheating during the period of maximum drawdown is compensated by an increase in the consumption of network water for the heating system during the hours of minimum drawdown.

The connection of subscriber units according to the principle of uncoupled control is used for central quality control according to the heating load, according to the principle of coupled control - for central regulation according to the combined load.

For closed heat supply systems with a prevailing (more than 65%) housing and communal load and with ratio (15), the central quality regulation of closed systems is used for the combined load of heating and hot water supply. At the same time, the connection of hot water heaters for at least 75% of subscribers must be carried out according to a two-stage sequential scheme.

The temperature schedule of the central quality control for the joint load of heating and hot water supply (Figure 4) is based on the heating and household temperature schedule (Appendix).

Before entering the heating system, network water passes through the upper stage heater, where its temperature decreases from to . The water consumption for hot water supply is changed by the temperature controller RT. The return water after the heating system enters the lower stage heater, where it cools down from to . During the hours of maximum water consumption, the temperature of the water entering the heating system decreases, which leads to a decrease in heat transfer. This imbalance is compensated during hours of minimum water consumption, when water enters the heating system with a temperature higher than required by the heating schedule.

We determine the balance load of hot water supply, Q g b, MW, according to the formula.

Associated control systems include, in addition to the main regulators, additional dynamic compensators. Calculation and adjustment of such systems is much more complicated than single-loop ACP, which prevents their wide application in industrial automation systems.

Consider methods for calculating multiply connected control systems using the example of an object with two inputs and two outputs.

3.1.1. Synthesis of uncoupled regulation

The block diagram of the system is shown in Figure 3.1. The transformation of the two-coordinate control system to equivalent single-loop ACP is given in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.1 - Structural diagram of incoherent regulation with interconnected coordinates

Figure 3.2 - Transformation of the two-coordinate control system to equivalent single-loop ACP

a - equivalent object for the first regulator; b - equivalent object for the second regulator.

Let us derive the transfer function of the equivalent plant in a single-loop ACP with the controller R1. As can be seen, such an object consists of a main control channel and a parallel complex system connected to it, including a second closed control loop and two cross object channels. The transfer function of the equivalent object has the form:

The second term on the right side of equation (7) reflects the influence of the second control loop on the one under consideration and, in essence, is a corrective amendment to the transfer function of the forward channel.

Similarly, for the second equivalent object, we obtain the transfer function in the form:

Based on the formulas, it can be assumed that if at some frequency the modulus of the corrective correction is negligible compared to the amplitude-frequency characteristic of the direct channel, the behavior of the equivalent object at this frequency will be determined by the direct channel.

The most important correction value is at the operating frequency of each circuit. In particular, if the operating frequencies of the two control loops co p i and oz p2 are significantly different, then it can be expected that their mutual influence will be insignificant, provided:

|W n2 (iω pl)|<< |W 11 (iω pl)| ; (9)

Where |W n2 (iω pl)| =

The greatest danger is the case when the inertia of the direct and cross channels is approximately the same. Let, for example, Wn(p)=W12(p)=W21(p)=W22(p)=W(p). Then for equivalent objects, provided that R1(p)=R2(p)=R(p), we obtain transfer functions:

frequency characteristics

(11)

On the stability boundary, according to the Nyquist criterion, we get:

or ; (12)

Where =l or |R(iω)|=0.5/|W(iω)|

So, the setting of the P-regulator, at which the system is on the border of stability, is half that in a single-loop ASR.

For a qualitative assessment of the mutual influence of control loops, a complex coupling coefficient is used:

;(13)

which is usually calculated at zero frequency (i.e., in steady state) and at the operating frequencies of the regulators co p i and co R 2. In particular, when w=0, the value of ks V is determined by the ratio of the gains for the cross and main channels:

SWR (0)=Ri2 R21 /(R11 R22); (14) If at these frequencies ks B =0, then the object can be considered as simply connected, with ks B >1 it is advisable to swap direct and cross channels; 0<кс В <1 расчет одноконтурных АСР необходимо вести по передаточным функциям эквивалентных объектов (7) и (8).

Calculate ks B for our option:

kcv = (ki2*k2i)/(k11*k22)=(0.47*0.0085)/(0.015*3.25)~0.11


3.1.2 Coupled control systems

Figure 8 shows the block diagrams of autonomous ACPs

Figure 3.3 - block diagrams of autonomous ACPs

a - compensation of influences from the second regulator in the first control loop;

b - compensation of influences from the first regulator in the second control loop;

c - autonomous control system of two coordinates. Figure Figure 8 - Structural diagrams of autonomous ACPs

o and c r n e e viol izgktyaniya

Union of Soviet

Socialist

Wrestblick

Auto dependent. certificate no.

Declared 11/11/1965 (No. 943575/24-6) with attachment of Application No.

UDC 621.165.7-546 (088.8) Committee for Inventions and Discoveries under the Council of Ministers

V. B. Rubin, G. I. Kuzmin and A. V. Rabinovich;

Chg n, b, All-Union Thermal Engineering Institute. F. E. Dzernvzschsky

Applicant

CONTROL METHOD OF HEATING TURBINES

There is a known method of uncoupled regulation of heating turbines, in which static autonomy is achieved by installing isodromic (or with a small unevenness) regulators of each parameter.

This method cannot be applied when several objects operate in parallel with at least one of the parameters, because the parallel inclusion of isodromic controllers is unacceptable and, moreover, during parallel operation, it is necessary to stabilize not the parameters, but the generalized forces of the objects acting on the parallel parameters. Therefore, in parallel operation on turbines, a more complex method of coupled regulation is used.

In principle, coupled systems ensure not only static but also dynamic control autonomy under all conditions. However, the achievement of dynamic autonomy in most cases is associated with significant design difficulties, therefore, in real systems, for economic reasons, full BBTOHQM is rarely provided. In addition, and from an operational point of view, it is only in very rare cases that the dynamic autonomy of the control loops must be strictly observed. The transition from simpler unrelated systems to more complex connected systems is often dictated only by the impossibility of obtaining static autonomy in known unrelated control schemes if parallel operation is required for any of the parameters. This transition leads not only to the complication of the scheme. In systems built according to the method of coupled regulation, autonomy is achieved parometrically - by selecting the gain factors (gear ratios) of cross-links between regulators. With constant gear ratios, autonomy is not maintained in all modes. In unrelated regulation, autonomy is provided compensatory (by regulators). In addition, the use of a coupled control system significantly complicates the methods of changing the circuit structure when the turbine is switched to special modes (for example, to work with back pressure, etc.). Stability issues are resolved satisfactorily with coupled and uncoupled control.

The proposed method makes it possible to achieve

25 static autonomy in uncoupled control systems, both in isolated and parallel operation, and thereby eliminates the need to use complex non-compensated coupled control systems in cogeneration turbines.

The essence of the invention lies in the fact that, as servo subsystems, regulators of the derivative (mechanical) power of the turbine and steam flow to the extraction are introduced into the unconnected speed and pressure control loops.

The scheme of the proposed method is shown in the drawing. An executive circuit 2 for controlling the derivative (mechanical) power is introduced into the speed control loop 1 of the turbines, i.e., the control loop for the generalized internal force of the object acting on the frequency of the system from the side of the turbogenerator.

The power control loop is made with isodromes. The power regulator 8 receives tasks from the speed regulator 4, from the manual sensor 5, from the system regulators o and acts only on high pressure valves 7. An executive circuit 9 for stabilizing the steam flow into the extraction is introduced into the pressure control circuit 8, i.e. regulation of the generalized internal force of the object, acting from the side of the turbogenerator on the pressure in the selection. The flow controller 10 receives tasks from the pressure controller 11, from the manual setpoint 12, from the system controllers 18 and acts only on the low pressure channels 14.

The remaining designations adopted in the drawing 1b - produced (mechanical) power of the turbine, 1b - steam flow directed by the turbine regulators to the selection, 17 - we give the (electric) power of the generator, 18 - steam consumption by the heat consumer, 19 - frequency (in isolated operation) or phase angle of the generator (in parallel operation), 20 - pressure in the extraction (in isolated operation) or pressure drop between the extraction chamber and the consumer (in parallel steam operation).

With isolated operation of the unit in terms of electrical and thermal load, static control independence is ensured in the circuit in the same way as in conventional systems of uncoupled control of heating turbines. When disturbed by the heat consumer and the low pressure valves move, the speed of the turbogenerator is stabilized by the speed controller (the power controller facilitates this task, as it stabilizes the turbine power). In the event of disturbance from the electrical consumer5

40 For the movement of high-pressure valves, the pressure in the extraction is stabilized by a pressure regulator, while the flow regulator facilitates this task, as it stabilizes the flow.

Static independence is maintained in the circuit even during parallel operation of the turbogenerator under electrical load and thermal load. In this case, the circuit works as follows. In the event of disturbance from the electrical consumer (change in frequency) when the high-pressure control valves are manually adjusted, the constant pressure in the static extraction is maintained by the flow regulator. When disturbed by the heat consumer and the low-pressure valves are rearranged, the invariance of the electrical load is ensured in statics by the power regulator. The connections inherent in coupled control schemes (between the speed controller and low pressure valves and between the pressure regulator and high pressure valves) are absent in the system. The input of power and flow rate pulses into the turbine control system can be carried out through electro-hydraulic converters commercially produced by turbo-building plants.

With the most common mode of operation of cogeneration turbines - parallel operation on electrical load and isolated operation on thermal load (to isolated boilers) - the control method is simplified. In this case, the flow control loop 9 is not needed and only the power control loop is introduced.

According to the same principle, instead of pressure and flow control loops, network water temperature and flow control loops can be introduced.

Subject of invention

A method for controlling heat-functional turbines equipped with uncoupled speed and pressure control systems, characterized in that, in order to ensure static autonomy both in isolated and parallel operation, a loop for controlling the produced power is introduced into the turbine speed control system, and a loop for controlling the produced power is introduced into the pressure control system ” steam flow control circuit in the extraction for neutralization in the statics of the mutual influence of loads.

Compiled by M. Mirimsky

Editor E. A. Krechetova Techred A. A. Kamyshnikova Proofreader E. D. Kurdyumova

Order 2527/8 Circulation 1220 Format paper. 60>

TsNIIPI of the Committee for Inventions and Discoveries under the Council of Ministers of the USSR

Moscow, Center, Serov Ave., 4

Printing house, Sapunova Ave., 2