The cheapest home building. What is better to build a house for permanent residence? Types of wall materials

The dream of owning a house is often shattered by the financial possibilities of a person and his family, since the construction process and the cost of materials are beyond the reach of many. But modern builders claim that everything is not so deplorable, and building your own housing is a very real task. Which house is cheaper to build, we will consider in the article.

What affects the cost of a cottage?

It is important to understand for what purposes you want to acquire a country house: for permanent year-round living or for staying in it only during the summer season. The following factors depend on this:

• space-planning solution;
• type of construction of the house;
• materials for the construction of building elements.

Which house is cheaper to build? If it is a country house, there is no need to arrange rooms for each family member in it, there are enough common areas with sleeping places, a kitchen, and a bathroom. If you want to build a house for permanent year-round use, it requires heating systems and walls made of more reliable and functional material that will not allow the premises to freeze in the winter.

Selecting and creating a project

In order to build a house yourself cheaply, once again without resorting to the services of professionals, it is important to correctly develop future object schemes and think about how the work will be performed.

An affordable cottage should have a compact layout. The main principle is the maximum combination of total and usable area. How to achieve this?

1) Combine the hallway and vestibule, make the room insulated. This is an excellent solution, since they carry the same functional load.

• Panel length - up to 3000 (3500) mm, depending on the manufacturer's capabilities.
• Width - 1250-1500 mm.
• Thickness - 168, 174 mm for external walls; 118 mm - for a partition; 174, 224 mm - for floors.
• The mass of a standard plate 2500x1250x174 mm is about 50 kg. It turns out that a house with an area of ​​150 m 2 will weigh about 15 tons, which is 4-5 times lighter in comparison with stone materials.

The thickness of the panel is calculated taking into account all the temperature effects of the middle lane and the north; additional thermal protection is not required. For clarity, a 120 mm slab is equivalent in heat retention capacity to a brick structure 2.5 meters in cross section.

The disadvantages of the element include the inability to pass air and accumulate moisture with polystyrene foam. However, when protected with OSB boards and external cladding, this practically does not happen.

Issue price

In the question of what is cheaper to build a house from, sip panels definitely win.

The average cost of 1 plate 2500x1250x174 mm is about 3000 rubles. (on average - 1200-1300 rubles / m 2). This is much more affordable than the most famous traditional material - wood, respectively, you can build a frame house cheaply.

Do not forget that the cost of erecting such a structure, in addition to sip panels, includes the cost of the skeleton itself, which can be made of metal or wooden beams. It is obvious that the use of the latter is more profitable - natural raw materials are more accessible, it is easier to mount it.

You can build a frame house cheaply on a turnkey basis in many companies that provide such a service. The price of a small two-story cottage with a terrace is about 1,000,000 rubles. If you neglect the services of professionals, you can save up to 30-40% of this cost. True, the timing will not be the same ...

We build ourselves

Finally, the most important saving point is work without the participation of professionals. How to cheaply build a house with your own hands? Consider in order in general terms using the example of a frame structure.

The first step is to decide on the materials. We looked at what you can build a cheap house from, so choose according to your pocket. The most accessible type of structure is framed with sip panels, therefore, determine the required number of plates and the volume of beams for the frame according to the layout schemes and types of structures drawn up earlier.

Foundation

The right choice of the type and material of the foundation is the first stage of the algorithm for how to build a house cheaply. The price of the foundation is about 20-30% of the total cost of the entire house.

Under the frame house, you do not need to arrange a massive base: as already mentioned, the mass of the entire structure is about 15 tons (and even less in the case of economy planning: 8-10 tons). The best and cheapest option can be considered the installation of a columnar foundation. It can be mounted both independently and with the help of professionals. For concreting, it is enough to use a solution of the brand M200-M250.

Walls

To build a house yourself cheaply, you will have to try and do the most capacious part of the work yourself - the installation of the frame.

For the lower strapping, take bars with a section of 150x50 mm and lay them on the edge on the surface of the finished foundation, covered with roofing material. In the corners they are connected with screws 100-120 mm, they must be attached to the base itself with the help of anchors or large self-tapping screws. Boards of the middle and outer strapping are attached to the inner bars. You can use the cutting method at the ends of the boards, then they are mounted end-to-end.

Then the surface of the resulting level is leveled, recesses are made under the floor logs with a jigsaw and installed.

Bars 50x50 mm are fixed to the inside of the lower trim - floor boards will be attached to them.

Next, vertical racks are placed: recesses are made on the outside of the strapping and the timber is fixed with the same self-tapping screws. Along the perimeter, the step between them is from 1 to 1.2 meters - it’s easier for an inexperienced assembler to connect all the components together and not make a mistake.

The fastening of the upper trim is similar to the lower one, the installation is carried out using metal corners.

You can often see cross planks between uprights. They are mounted to strengthen the structure with large spans or complex solutions, for an economy house this is not so important, we can do without them. But the slopes at the top and at the base of the rack can be installed.

When the frame is ready, you can make the sheathing with the panels themselves.

Thus, it is possible to build a frame house cheaply. The prices for materials are not too high, and you will do the work yourself.

Finishing

So that the miser does not pay twice, it is necessary to carefully isolate the external walls from environmental influences that can soak or destroy the structure of the sip panel. Plastering can act as a budget option for finishing, but first the surface must be pasted over with polystyrene foam. The price of 1 m 2 of such a cladding is about 700-900 rubles.

It is also good to use vinyl or PVC siding. Perhaps this is the cheapest way - about 400 rubles. per square meter.

Finishing with decorative plates or artificial stone will cost 900-1200 rubles / m 2. Such cladding of frame houses is rare: many believe that sip panels are not able to withstand this load, but this is a delusion.

The most expensive, but the most reliable and durable type of cladding is brick.

How to cheaply build a house with your own hands, we examined. Everything is much easier than it seemed.

To build or not to build?

We have found the cheapest way to build your own cottage. There is nothing difficult in this process, the main thing is to start. Then you can build a frame house cheaply in a relatively short time. Prices per square meter of such housing can vary, averaging 11,000 - 15,000 rubles, which is very cheap compared to other types of real estate.

Many criticize this type of house, believing that the material is short-lived and impractical. We have considered some properties of sip panels, they are more effective than other materials in some properties. Each material has weaknesses, and concrete can be criticized.

From what material it is cheaper to build a house, residents of America know firsthand. This type of housing is widespread on the continent in the northern regions, which clearly demonstrates its ability to withstand both temperature extremes and the effects of precipitation. Hence the name - "Canadian House".

Do not limit yourself in fulfilling the dream of your home! There is always a solution.

Building a new home is always a big expense. Few people can afford to build without paying attention to estimates. Most often, you have to save money to fit into the budget. However, the savings must be reasonable, because the owner and his family will live in the new place. The building should be warm, dry, comfortable, pleasing to the eye. How to achieve this without overpayments? First of all, save on a team of workers. If the developer has the necessary skills, then everything or almost everything can be done by yourself. You can also choose inexpensive materials, available technologies, a standard project. What is the cheapest way to build a house with your own hands? What is worth saving on, and where is it better not to take risks?

Savings start with project selection. The more complex the architectural forms, the more expensive the construction. It is irrational to try to cut costs at the expense of workers, technical supervision or the quality of materials by initially choosing an expensive project.

It is better to clearly define the necessary living space, without depriving the family, but also without allowing yourself extra square meters, choose a simple roof shape. This will allow you to create a cozy home that fully meets the needs of the family, but without architectural "excesses" - a multi-pitched roof, bay windows, columns, arches.

It makes sense to consider construction options for a one- or two-story structure with a residential attic.

A residential attic is much more profitable than a separate floor. For the construction of the floor, more materials will be needed - for walls, insulation, decoration

If you choose lightweight building materials and suitable technologies for building walls, you can save on foundations. You will need a less powerful structure, plus the formwork can be made from substandard boards, used fiberboards.

The only thing that is undesirable to cut costs is cement. It needs to be bought of high quality, otherwise the strength of the structure will be a big question. The depth of the trench under the foundation must also correspond to the estimated weight of the building in order to avoid heavy settlement, which can lead to cracks in the walls.

What is most often used in construction:

• brick;
• beam;
• gas block

In the construction of houses and cottages, frame technology is increasingly being used. This is a promising method that allows you to build quickly and at minimal cost.

To find out what the building will cost the cheapest, you will have to calculate estimates for each of the options, because. the cost of the material itself is far from always an indicator of benefit. For example, opting for multipurpose resources can help reduce costs. The cost of hydro, vapor barrier "two in one" will ultimately cost less than buying two different types of insulation.

When calculating, one should proceed from the fact that the finished building should be comfortable for living, comply with heat saving and safety standards.

The advantages of a frame structure are in less time and labor costs for the construction of a building. The design is light, does not create an increased load on the foundation and does not require its strengthening

A dwelling using this technology is being built in terms of several weeks to several months, depending on whether the owner builds it himself or hires a team. Finished buildings are durable, resistant to deformation. The estimated service life is about 75 years.

Bearing structures are convenient for subsequent sheathing with finishing materials, because. all elements are unified. This significantly expands: siding, cassette panels, block house can be mounted on the walls. When sheathed, the strength of the entire structure increases without a significant increase in its weight.

Construction video

There are two main technologies, each of which has its own characteristics.

Frame-panel. What is the cheapest way to build a house? Collected by myself. Of course, this will require skills and equipment. Thanks to this type of construction, this is possible, although it will take a lot of time and additional money to buy insulation and other things. The frame is made of wood and sheathed with sandwich panels. Each part has to be mounted separately, which affects the timing and complexity of construction.

Frame-panel. This option is expensive, but reliable and requires much less labor. The design is assembled from ready-made shields, which are manufactured at the factory by special order. Shields are delivered already insulated and completely ready for assembly. If we compare the prices of panel and panel buildings, then the former are more expensive. However, the final cost may turn out to be the same if workers are invited to assemble frame-panel housing, because you have to pay for all types of work separately - assembly, sheathing, thermal insulation, finishing.

The assembled wooden frame already looks like a finished house. It only requires sheathing and finishing. Steam and waterproofing materials are installed in the walls of the structure at the factory, which helps to increase the life of the building

Undeniable advantages of technology:

• Profitability. Light weight is an obvious opportunity to save on the foundation, and short terms - on the payment of workers. It is believed that houses built using frame technology are the cheapest, but in many respects the economy depends on the area of ​​\u200b\u200bconstruction, the selected components, finishes, etc. Calculations by experienced engineers show that this is beneficial if the length of the building does not exceed 20 m, and the number of storeys is 3. Often, everything is decided by the project.
• High energy saving ratio. Designs quickly and efficiently warm up. The walls are made of materials with low thermal conductivity, thanks to which the structure retains heat well. The thickness of the wall can be 15-20 cm. Additional benefits include lower heating costs compared to a conventional building of the same area.
• No shrinkage. The walls of the structure are durable, resistant to deformation, they are highly rigid, and the house itself does not shrink. This also has a positive effect on the timing of construction: finishing work can begin immediately after the completion of the main work. Sheathing does not require additional processing, which reduces the cost of finishing.

Disadvantages or things to consider:

• To assemble such a structure, special knowledge and tools are needed. The qualifications of builders are of fundamental importance, so not every developer can do it on his own, and the team will have to be carefully selected.
• Wooden frames require additional treatment with compounds for biological and fire protection.

When choosing a project, special attention should be paid to ventilation. Artificial materials perfectly insulate, but from the point of view of environmental safety, they leave much to be desired. If the dwelling is small, then theoretically it is possible to get by with natural ventilation, but ideally, a system of normal air exchange should also be calculated and installed for it.

When mounting frame structures, "wet" technologies are not used. This feature is a big plus, because. allows you to work at any time of the year

Tightness is one of the main advantages of a frame house, because. serves as a guarantee of good thermal insulation. But it also has a downside - a violation of air exchange. So that human waste products, dust and other factors do not worsen the microclimate in the building, do not reduce the amount of oxygen in the air, it is necessary to design a high-quality ventilation system

What to make from:

• Wood. Despite all kinds of processing, wood is exposed to moisture, microorganisms. On average, such a frame serves up to 60 years and is inferior to metal counterparts in terms of strength, lightness, and resistance to destructive environmental factors.
• Metal. For manufacturing, a light thermal profile is used. Its advantages are excellent fire resistance, low weight, corrosion resistance. Metal parts are not subject to attack by fungi and mold. All this can increase the service life of structures up to 100 years.

What is cheaper to build? When drawing up an estimate, a clear advantage will be behind a wooden frame. However, if we "look into the future" and take into account the higher performance properties of the thermal profile, then its service life fully pays for the costs.

The foundation can be chosen tiled, columnar or tape, depending on the type of soil. You can save on an easy-to-install roof - gable or attic. The choice is up to the builder.

Material on the construction of a veranda in a frame-type cottage may also be useful:

1 sq. m metal frame weighs 30-50 kg, with sheathing - about 200 kg. The small specific gravity of the finished house allows you to build on unstable soils. The profile is also used in the reconstruction of buildings with heavily worn load-bearing structures.

Option # 2 - brick building

Brick is one of the most popular. Houses made of it can hardly be called cheap. The walls have to be made thick, plus they require additional insulation, which leads to an even greater increase in the cost of structures. The weight of the finished structure is large, so the foundation needs to be really strong. It is done to the entire depth of soil freezing.

It's hard to save money on it. The disadvantages include long, laborious construction. However, the durability of structures, their fire safety and practicality largely offset the costs.

If you look at the prices for the construction of a solid building on the websites of specialized companies, you get the impression that the cost is low. However, even the price of turnkey construction does not include fine finishing: installation of flooring, interior doors, plumbing fixtures, etc.

If you do all this yourself, then only the cost of purchasing materials should be added to the cost. If you need to hire workers, then also pay them. Construction is profitable only if the owner of the site initially correctly selected the project and can perform most of the work on his own.

Video: about brick for buildings

Option # 3 - aerated concrete blocks

Aerated concrete block is a worthy competitor to traditional brick. Building a box is much more profitable than building it. The wall thickness can be reduced by 1/3 without loss of thermal insulation properties. The material itself is noticeably lighter, which allows savings due to the foundation. An additional "bonus" for the owner of the house is good sound insulation.

A dwelling made of aerated concrete blocks "breathes", air exchange is not disturbed in it, because. through pores. However, for the same reason, blocks are considered not the best option in terms of waterproofing. If construction is carried out in violation of technology, the finished structure can also be blown through. You need to pay attention to the finish.

As for the construction time, an aerated concrete structure can be erected 2-3 times faster than a brick one, it practically does not shrink. To connect the blocks, special adhesives are used. In this case, it is undesirable to use a conventional cement mortar, because. it gives thick seams, which can cause the formation of "cold bridges".

One of the disadvantages of aerated concrete blocks is the relatively low frost resistance, so you have to take care of a quality finish. As materials, you can use plaster, siding, stone

Option # 4 - economical timber buildings

For the developer, timber is more profitable than anything else. If we compare timber and brick walls in terms of heat-saving properties, it turns out that a structure made of spruce with a thickness of 220 mm and brick with a thickness of 600 mm will be equally warm. Usually, a 200 mm beam is taken for construction, a 100 mm thick insulation is used and a plaster layer of 20 mm is applied.

The advantages of the beam:

• profitability;
• fast construction (built in a few weeks);
• simple technology;
• environmental Safety;
• excellent thermal insulation;
• comfortable microclimate;
• lightness of construction.

If you choose what is cheaper to build a house from, then timber is a win-win option. It is profitable, and the technology is simple, and almost any owner of the site can master it, if he already has the skills of the construction business.

When building houses from a bar, you need to carefully design heating and power supply systems. Buildings are considered fire hazardous. Also, the tree is afraid of moisture, therefore, it requires protection from dampness and fungus.

Compare prices per square meter

How and from what it is cheapest to build can be seen in the figures of the estimates. If the calculations are based on average indicators (the depth of soil freezing is 1.5 m, groundwater is 2.5 m, sandy loamy soil), then we can determine the cost of building 1 square meter. Depending on the components, the numbers will be as follows:

• frame construction - 875 rubles;
• brick - 2330 rubles;
• aerated concrete - 2000 rubles;
• timber - 1900 rubles.

Review of popular materials - video

Obviously, a frame house will cost the developer the cheapest. When finally deciding on the choice, you need to take into account all the features of the project, the soil, the site itself. The calculations do not include payment for the services of the construction team. Hired labor is an additional (and considerable!) item of expenditure.

The question of which house to build is the cheapest to worry about every private developer. The maximum benefit can be derived if the land is already owned or there is an opportunity to purchase it relatively inexpensively. For the rest, you can refer to the recommendations discussed below.

Lowering the issues associated with the purchase of land, the cost of building your own home influenced by the following factors:

• architectural and planning solutions. The developer must understand that even inexpensive housing must be modern, comfortable, functional;
• constructive building solutions. Here it is advisable to exclude architectural excesses, the design of the house should be as simple as possible;
• cost of materials and labor. Savings do not exclude the high manufacturability of work and the quality of the materials used. The construction project can be implemented independently or with the involvement of a team consisting of 2-3 people, which slightly affects the cost of work.

Any project taken on the Internet can be upgraded by turning a stone into a frame and vice versa. However, such manipulations should become a bore for professionals - they don’t save here

Building a house with your own hands - what to consider in the project

The cost of construction depends on the total area of ​​the future housing. It is optimal to lay the dimensions of 9 * 6 m, where 2-3 living rooms will be successfully placed.

An example of architectural and planning solutions:

• the basic principle is the minimum ratio of the total area to the usable area, without loss of convenience for living. Simply put, it is necessary to build a house inexpensively on a turnkey basis so that it is comfortable to be in it;
• an effective layout is the presence of two bedrooms with an area of ​​9-10 m², a combined bathroom - 3-4 m², an entrance hall combined with a vestibule - 3 m², a living room combined with a kitchen area - 25-26 m²;
• thus, the total area of ​​housing will be 52-54 m², with a usable area of ​​at least 50 m², which is 96%;
• in the house it is not necessary to equip pantries. On a personal plot, a number of additional buildings can be erected, which will fill this gap;
• similar projects can be found on the Internet and get acquainted with them in more detail.

Which house is cheaper to build one-story or two-story? Undoubtedly, the construction of a typical building on one floor is less expensive. However, this solution is less profitable. With a similar area, it is more expedient to build a two-story house (for example, 2 floors of 50 m² than 1 floor of 100 m²).

Constructive decisions:

• the simplest designs are a tangible contribution to the economy of construction. If you lay the width of the building at 6 m, this is quite enough for arranging floors, but does not require the construction of an additional load-bearing wall, which is reflected in the design of the foundation and basement;
• combining the living room and kitchen helps to save on the arrangement of partitions, doors;
• the optimal width of the walls is laid at 30 cm. The thermal stability of the object is subsequently regulated by the facade cladding and additional insulation, depending on the climatic conditions of construction;
• partitions can be made of drywall, which also does not require laying the foundation. Similar structures are built using a simplified technology;
• the cheapest roof is gable, no frills.

With the modern mobile standard of living, the construction of brick houses is losing relevance day by day. Even for private purposes, it is impractical to build such buildings; many turn to cheaper technologies.

Work and materials:

• the cost of work often takes the lion's share of the costs. However, the use of modern high-tech materials allows you to bypass this cost item. Modern materials are designed for a simple home master, that is, about 90% of the work can be done independently or with 2-3 assistants;
• for some types of work, you cannot do without the participation of a professional (here you should rely on your own strength). However, as was said, the costs of such services will not exceed 10%.

What building material will be cheaper

When choosing materials for construction, brick, steel frame structures, natural wood, concrete blocks are often considered.

Brick

it strong, durable but heavy material. Despite the excellent sound insulation, environmental friendliness, availability for sale, it will not be possible to conduct economical construction from it. It will be necessary to lay a deep bearing foundation, the work itself is long, the brick is difficult to process. Finished housing without additional measures will be characterized by insufficient energy saving.

Steel structures

This is a durable and affordable material that helps to build a reliable, comfortable and inexpensive home in the shortest possible time. Practice shows that a frame house is really affordable, easy to install, has a high bearing capacity against the background of a small mass and is versatile - if you wish, you can implement any project. The advantages include the possibility of arranging a unique exterior. However, additional, sound, heat insulation, measures to strengthen the strength will be required.

Wood

Despite all the advantages of the material (strength, environmental friendliness, sound and heat insulation, external characteristics, etc.), it cannot be called economical. Good wood - timber, a log is available at a high cost and requires treatment measures against pests, decay.

If construction cannot be done by hand, the key to high efficiency without extra costs is the choice of one team responsible for the entire cycle of work.

Cellular concrete, block concrete

This is a modern option that allows you to quickly and inexpensively build a good, environmentally friendly housing with a high load capacity, strength, low weight. The material is easy to process, which simplifies the exterior and interior decoration, but requires high-quality implementation of this stage of work.

Option for permanent residence

Choosing from a variety of materials, optimally stops on block concrete. Finished housing is suitable for living in almost any climatic zone of the country, construction technology is easy to master, which allows you to build with your own hands. Frame houses are no less effective, projects, photos and prices of which are available in a wide variety on the net.

It is cheaper to implement a house project from foam blocks (or other block material) with the following characteristics:

• shallow monolithic reinforced concrete foundation;
• plinth and concrete pavement. Implemented using brickwork in 1 brick, 250 mm;
• wall structures - gas silicate, aerated concrete, foam concrete, 300 mm;
• exterior cladding - crate, insulation, vinyl siding;
• ceilings and roofing - wooden trusses, metal profile coating along the crate, vapor barrier, insulation, drywall;
• window structures - wood / metal-plastic + installation;
• interior decoration, partitions, door blocks - drywall with sound insulation, plastic panels, wallpaper;
• flooring - concrete preparation, ceramic tiles, carpet, laminate;
• sewerage, water supply - PVC pipes, plumbing equipment;
• heating system - a double-circuit wall-mounted boiler, plastic pipes for hot water supply, heating, aluminum radiators;
• electrician corresponding to the design of the house.

Do not save on soil research. Even with quite prosperous neighboring sites, your own may differ in other characteristics

So that the whole economy does not turn into a collapse, it should check out these tips:

• when choosing a ready-made standard project, it should be foreseen for what climatic conditions it is designed (wind / snow load, seasonal outdoor temperatures);
• it is necessary to bind the bearing base to the soil conditions of the site. This will minimize the cost of its construction;
• if the project is selected, it is impossible to make additional changes to it, for example, change the material of the walls and their design, the size of window and door openings, the arrangement of additional openings, the replacement of ceilings, etc.;
• Don't skimp too much on communications. High-quality engineering systems, sewerage, water supply, communication, ventilation, entrances to the site ensure the quality and comfort of living.

Summing up some results, it can be noted that a cheap house is not a low-quality, cramped, uncomfortable housing. First of all, this is a reasonable and rational approach of the owner to the construction process and the choice of materials.

The original and original project of a house made of waste materials is presented in the video:

It's time to explain why aerated concrete is the most correct material for the walls of a country house and no other material can compete with it in terms of its characteristics. I propose to consider together all the building materials currently on the market (including rare and exotic ones) and make sure that there is no better material than aerated concrete for low-rise construction.

But in any case, a frame house made of wooden wall materials is the best thing to choose in our time. Thus, we actually get that with all the variety of existing building materials, we are left with only two options:

House made of cellular concrete (aerated concrete)
Frame house

All other building materials, in principle, are not consistent and it makes no sense to consider them if you are building a house for the long term for long-term and comfortable operation. And now is the time to make a direct comparison of a house made of aerated concrete and a frame.

Let me remind you that in both cases we are guided by the fact that the house will be built on a monolithic foundation slab, that is, the low heat capacity of the walls of a frame house is not relevant in our case. If you decide to build a frame house on a pile foundation, then soberly understand that the heat capacity of such a house will tend to zero and any shutdown of heating in winter will lead to almost instant freezing of the whole house. If we are talking about a house for permanent residence and year-round operation, it must have an extremely high heat capacity of the building envelope, because. it is on this parameter that the comfort of operating such a house directly depends.

The main advantage of a frame house is the ability to get an incredibly “warm” wall at a minimum cost. This is directly related to the fact that for light insulation, the resistance to heat transfer per centimeter of thickness is 2-3 times less than that of solid wood or even aerated concrete.

The second predominantly frame houses is the speed of erection of the supporting frame of walls and roofs. In fact, the advantage is rather doubtful if you approach the house as a complex object. Because the subsequent finishing of the frame house, firstly, will no longer be so fast, and secondly, you will also have to tinker with the engineering systems. But if you want to get a roof over your head here and now (it doesn’t matter that you still have to work and work under this roof so that the house finally looks like a house), then you can agree to a frame house. The same applies to the recently popular modular houses assembled in production. Their manufacturers position the assembly in the hangar as an advantage for the customer, although in fact the customer should not care at all, because. This does not affect the production time in any way. But for the performer, the assembly under the roof of the hangar is a big plus, because. allows to reduce costs and downtime associated with the unpredictability of the weather, if we consider the option of building on the customer's site. But on the other hand, the customer becomes severely limited by the too small sizes of individual modules, which are completely uncomfortable for subsequent operation (for example, ceilings in a normal house should be at least 2.8 meters).

This is where the advantages of frame houses end and the disadvantages begin.

First, and most important. Frame houses are now being built by everyone who is not too lazy (because the cost of building a frame house is extremely low and you can “weld” well), which requires special control over compliance with construction technology. Otherwise, you can get such a barn, which will collapse at the slightest gust of wind. According to the link in the video, everything that could be broken was broken, but in fact, during a hurricane, it is very likely that a well-built frame house will collapse to one degree or another, and you need to be prepared for this. The calculation of loads for a frame house must be done more carefully than for a stone house, paradoxical as it may seem.

The second disadvantage of frame houses is the expensive finishing and laying of engineering systems in an open way. After all, it is forbidden to lay electrical wiring in combustible structures, and therefore it will have to be conducted in an open way, which is very doubtful from an aesthetic point of view. In a house made of cellular concrete, everything is much simpler - all communications and wires are laid in the walls, which are then plastered. Absolutely the same as they do in apartments.

By the way, about ventilation. If you “forget” to do it in an aerated concrete house, then the high vapor permeability of the walls will allow you to somehow cope with excess humidity in the house, and in a frame thermos house without ventilation with a microclimate, everything will be very bad.

What else?
The sound insulation of a frame house is just as bad as that of an unplastered cellular concrete house.
Hanging heavy objects on the walls is possible only on the supporting frame.
Mice and other pests can start in the walls of a frame house.
Fire hazard. Stone houses also burn, but this rarely leads to the collapse of walls and ceilings. The frame house burns down instantly, despite various impregnations for wood (remember that the electrician in the frame house can only be carried out in an open way).
The durability of a frame house rests on the service life of a wooden frame (and without protection, the tree will begin to rot). While stone building materials (including cellular concrete) are eternal, cement-based materials only become stronger over the years.

If we compare completely finished houses of the same area, with engineering systems and finishes, we can make an amazing discovery. The cost of work and materials for a frame house is almost identical to the cost of work and materials for building a house from aerated concrete. Of course, an aerated concrete house will turn out to be a little more expensive, because. during its construction, mechanization will be required, but this will be less than 10% of the total cost of all work.

Thus, we can conclude that aerated concrete is an ideal building material, which has no alternatives in principle. A frame house should be considered only if, for one reason or another, you do not have the opportunity to build a house from cellular concrete.

In the next part, we will choose the perfect roof for a country house. Don't switch!

Living in your own home has many more advantages than even the most luxurious apartment. A private home is a place where you are free to do whatever you want. Here you will not be disturbed by noisy neighbors who want to make repairs early in the morning or late. Here you are not at risk of being flooded or experiencing the inconvenience that apartment residents face. Many are accustomed to believing that buying a plot, and even more so building a house on it, is fabulous money. However, with the development of modern technologies in construction, the cheapest technology for building a house has become several times more affordable. Now we will consider the main question: where to start, and most importantly, from what to build the cheapest house?

Preparatory stage

The first point that needs to be determined initially is the functionality of the house. What is it for.

If this is a country cottage for seasonal living, then only materials are needed,

if this is a full-fledged house for permanent residence, then it is completely different.

To decide what kind of house will be, you should thoroughly study the climate and weather conditions of the region where construction is planned. After all, the choice of building materials directly depends on the temperature regime during the year. A house for regular residence must be constantly heated during the cold season, which entails certain financial costs. Therefore, when choosing a material for a building, one should be guided by thermophysical properties: thermal conductivity and heat capacity, as well as shrinkage.

Each climatic region has its own temperature regime, wind speed and protection class in terms of heat-shielding properties. Therefore, when choosing a material and calculating the thickness of the walls, two main parameters must be taken into account: the coefficient of thermal resistance and thermal conductivity.

For each region, its own specially calculated indicator of the thermal resistance of the CTS is used. In order to obtain clarity on the upcoming heating costs, it is necessary to calculate the CTS of the future design. To do this, the width (δ) of the wall is divided by the coefficient of thermal conductivity (λ), which is indicated in the technical specifications of the building material R = δ / λ. The calculated value of heat transfer resistance must comply with the standard.

As an example, consider the use of cellular concrete, which has a thermal conductivity coefficient of 0.12 W / m * ºС. Let's take a block with a thickness of 0.3 meters and calculate: R \u003d 0.3 / 0.12 \u003d 2.5 W / m 2 * ºС. This figure is below the norm and is suitable, except for construction in the southern regions of Russia. A block with a width of 0.4 meters gives a heat transfer resistance of 0.4 / 0.12 \u003d 3.3 W / m 2 * ºС, which is slightly higher than the standard indicator and can be used in the construction of buildings in Moscow and St. Petersburg. The calculation is relevant only when laying blocks on glue.

To determine the wall thickness corresponding to the advanced generally accepted standards in terms of energy efficiency, you can use the same formula, where it will be equal to the product of the heat transfer resistance value and the thermal conductivity coefficient δ \u003d λ x R.

From this it follows that in order to obtain the standard value of resistance λ = 3.2, the thickness of the wall from a solid wood of coniferous species (pine, spruce) will be 0.18 x 3.2 = 0.576 m, from brick 0.81 x 3.2 = 2.592 m, and from concrete 2.04 x 3.2 = 6.528 m. At the same time, mineral wool insulation with a thickness of 140-150 mm complies with the standard: 0.045 x 3.2 = 0.14 m.

Therefore, when choosing a material and determining the thickness of a structure, one should take into account the resistance to heat transfer and the coefficient of thermal conductivity.

Coefficient of thermal conductivity,

specific heat

and the change in linear dimensions for each material is different.

In addition, when choosing a material for building an inexpensive house, you need to study the market for building materials that are typical for this region. Delivery of materials, as a rule, occupies a considerable share in their cost.

Now you need to decide on the size of the future home. For example, do you want to build a one-story house inexpensively or the house will have more floors. What will be the area of ​​the house in relation to the area of ​​your site?
You can calculate the area of ​​​​your plot online.

Windows of standard sizes;

Practical layout without frills;

simple roof;

Available building materials;

Flat small fireplace;

You should also take into account one important nuance, if you have a small plot, then you can choose a simple project of a two-story house. Such a solution will be much cheaper than building a one-story large house.

The cost of a future home is determined by three components, on each of which you can save:

• architectural layout is compact, maximum functionality and comfort and allows you to achieve 20% savings;
• a simple design solution should be rational and not contain any architectural frills will provide another 10% savings;
• modern materials make it possible to use the latest technologies in construction, allowing you to do the work yourself or with the involvement of a minimum amount of outside labor, which guarantees up to 40% savings in the end result.

The optimal solution for a family of 2-3 people is housing consisting of three rooms with a total area of ​​approximately 50 m 2 . A reasonable option would be a 6×9 house, which includes: two bedrooms, a living room in the form of a studio, with a kitchen, a combined bathroom and toilet, and a small entrance hall.
<

Layout: maximum functionality and comfort

The main principle of space planning is to extract the maximum benefit from each square meter of space. In our case, this is the ratio of total and usable space. This house, consisting of three rooms with a total area of ​​54 m 2, will fully satisfy your needs in modern housing. Moreover, the ratio of total and usable area (52 m 2) is 96.3%.

But over time, you will want to increase its area. Such a structure is most suitable for transformation. It can be expanded in width and height.

Second option

Important! The construction of the second floor must be thought out in advance in order to lay the appropriate foundation.

Third option, first floor

Third option, second floor

The exterior of the house economy option

Exterior view of the house after expansion

The key to savings: simplicity of design

Designs should also be approached as simply as possible, without additional frills. With economical construction, there are a number of points that must be considered:

• The selected house width of 6 m will allow you to easily install floor slabs. The standard size will not require the construction of an additional load-bearing wall.
• Combining the dining kitchen and the hall into a modern living room, according to European standards, will save on the absence of walls and doors.
• A sufficient width of the walls will be 30 cm, and heat resistance can be achieved due to the thickness of the layer of heat-insulating material when facing the house. In this case, the plinth is reduced in width to 25 cm.
• It is advisable to make the walls in the house from drywall, they do not require a foundation and are easy to install.
• The roof is made gable, without unnecessary frills - this is the most cost-effective design.

Building a cheap house with your own hands is the most economical option

Approximately half of the cost of construction is payment for the performance of work. When building a cheap house, it is more expedient to do the maximum amount of work with your own hands, without involving hired workers.

Why you need to purchase only modern material. Its installation technologies are designed for a simple average person, so construction will not require professional skills from you and will provide an opportunity to save money. As a labor force, you can attract one assistant. If you do not have free time to build a house with your own hands, hire a team of two people with the appropriate qualifications, leaving control over the work.

Another option is the construction of standard projects. Here you do not need to participate in the construction, it is enough to take the finished house into operation, be sure to draw up an act of acceptance of the work performed, clarifying the warranty obligations of the developer.
This 6×9 house is a great version of a two-story transformation.

Reviews and disputes: which cheap house is better?

To explain which of the cheap houses is better, we invite you to read the comments we have collected from various forums:

Alexander V.

I want to talk about building a cheap house. And I will touch not only the monetary side of the issue, but also the labor-intensive one. We buy modern materials, preferably in a construction hypermarket, where prices are much cheaper. We discard ideas about buildings from improvised materials (clay, straw, savage stone) as untenable. In the 21st century, we can talk about how walls made of clay and a foundation made of rubble. We are talking about modern housing, not Grandpa Pumpkin's house. We will not even consider the environmental friendliness of building materials. At the time of the developed world wide web, you can find the most controversial opinions about any material.
Hired builders will not be considered either. This multiplies the estimate at least twice initially. We carry out construction on our own, everyone can do it. The issue is the duration of the process.
And so the foundation. When building a house, you can not do without it. The most expedient and cost-effective - strip foundation on piles. The job is not difficult. Every 2m we drill piles, the length depends on the soil, and pour the grillage.
Nevertheless, the cheapest construction will be a frame house, insulated with mineral wool or polystyrene foam. Building a house of brick or sides on cement mortar will increase the cost of the estimate, take a lot of time, as a result we get a cold building that requires insulation.

Bogdan S.

I was going to build a house 6 × 9. For the past two months, I have been doing a personal project and drawing up a construction estimate. I read smart books, I participate in forums on all topics of interest, I watch videos. Now I read it and understand that everything is as you said: the foundation is piled, the house is frame, the roof is slate. Finishing inside: drywall, OSB boards and wallpaper. Of course plus heating and lighting. One thing I can say is that I do not invest in 10 thousand conditional raccoons. A bit more.

Sergei Zh.

I developed a project for a house of 50 m2 for my friend. Nothing special budget option, but house for year-round use. The foundation is solid. Wooden frame house insulated with mineral wool. Outside vapor barrier film, inside hardboard. The roof is slate. Pretty warm building, suitable for winter use. Appearance is not very good. Just covered with vapor barrier. Subsequently, you can sew up the siding. But the budget is the most modest. A friend spent only 4 thousand USD. True, he built it himself, he didn’t even want to hear about any hired brigade.

Looking at my house, I am more and more convinced that it is hardly possible to build anything cheaper than a frame house. I insulated the walls, rollers, the roof with mineral wool 15 cm thick. In addition, I built an attic floor. My roof is the simplest gable, covered with zerolin. Outside finished with siding, and inside the OSB and pasted wallpaper. It cost me a pleasure of $ 9,500.

The frame is the cheapest and warmest, but this does not mean that it is free. Everything is relative. My friends built a house from Sibit. They were happy until winter came. They froze through the winter, and now they are deciding how to insulate themselves and what it will be like.

Of course, the main costs are building materials, which we will talk about in more detail.

Modern building materials - the cheapest way to build a house

There is a lot of competition in the building materials market today. Therefore, by making a small detour of the main points of purchase, building materials such as a hypermarket, a bazaar or a warehouse, it will not be difficult to find the most reasonable price. But different material differs significantly in price.

The author of the article does not pursue the goal of promoting this or that building material, since the site does not sell them. The main thing is that a person who has a limited budget for construction can become the owner of a good and solid house.

Before reading the various options for houses, pay attention to Compared with other houses, it is characterized by cheap construction.

Cheap brick house?

1. Brick.

As many people know, brick is one of the most durable, but at the same time heavy materials. Based on this, it has both advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages:

1. high strength and durability;
2. excellent sound insulation;
3. availability;
4. environmental friendliness.

Flaws:

1. large mass - laying a solid foundation will be required;
2. insufficient energy saving;
3. poorly processed;
4. long construction process.

Modern brick allows you to build any size and design of the house.

Cheap steel structure house

1. Steel strong constructions.

Today it is one of the most durable and affordable building materials, which allows you to build reliable structures, houses, etc. in the shortest possible time.

Advantages:

1. affordable cost;
2. quick and easy installation;
3. versatility - you can build any structure;
4. using modern finishing materials, you can create a unique exterior.

Flaws:

1. low strength;
2. poor and thermal insulation sound insulation without the presence of additional insulating materials.

Steel durable structures are becoming more and more popular today in the construction of private houses.

Cheap wooden house - is it true

1. Log or timber

A modern stylish log house looks amazing, and high environmental friendliness, durability and thermal insulation distinguish this building material from others.

Advantages:

1. high strength;
2. environmental friendliness;
3. excellent sound insulation;
4. quick and easy installation;
5. high thermal insulation;
6. easy to process;
7. relatively small weight;
8. amazing appearance.

Flaws:

1. price;
2. the need for additional pest control;
3. fire hazard without special impregnations;
4. low water resistance.

A modern house made of logs or timber is stylish, practical and comfortable.

Favorite: cheap foam concrete house

1. Foam concrete is the most profitable material for building a house.

A lightweight building material that outperforms others in its characteristics.

Advantages:

1. quick and easy installation;
2. high load capacity and low weight;
3. over time, high strength;
4. excellent sound and heat insulation;
5. light weight;
6. acceptable cost;
7. easy to process;
8. environmental friendliness.

Disadvantages:

1. the first few years after manufacture has a low strength;
2. the porous structure of foam concrete will require additional finishing work;
3. hot in the summer.

Foam concrete is the cheapest way to build a house.

We looked at some of the most affordable building materials that can be used to build an inexpensive home. Today they are also widely used: twin blocks, monolith, ceramic stone, etc.

For example, the cost of a one-story frame house with two rooms, a kitchen, a living room and a bathroom will cost 600-700 thousand rubles. Thus, the cheapest frame houses can be built for relatively little money.

We also recommend you: